Context:
On December 10, the Opposition submitted a noconfidence motion against Vice President Jagdeep
Dhankhar.
↪ Allegations: Engaging in partisan conduct and acting as an impassioned spokesperson for the government.
↪ Procedure for Impeachment:
Constitutional Authority:
Vice President draws powers from Article 63 and
serves as the ex-officio Chairman of the Rajya
Sabha.
↪ Grounds for Removal:
1. Article 67(b): Vice President can be removed if a
majority of Rajya Sabha members pass a
resolution, which must then be agreed to by the
Lok Sabha.
2. A 14-day notice is mandatory before the
resolution can be considered.
↪ Constitutional Provisions:
1. The motion must be passed in both Houses of
Parliament to be valid.
2. During this process: The Vice President
(Chairman) cannot preside over proceedings but
can speak and participate.
↪ Historical Context: How rare are such revivals?
India’s parliamentary records show very few cases of impeachment court proceedings against conservative officials. This rarity highlights the seriousness of the allegations and the political context.
↪ The implications of the proposal
The outcome of the group, whether active or currently inactive, will have comprehensive results:
1. For legislative efficiency: Hit movement can disrupt legislative functioning and increase political divisions.
2. On the role of the Vice President: It raises questions about the ability of the Vice President to maintain partisanship and fulfill parliamentary responsibilities.
3. On opposition policy: This drift suggests a conservative approach to the government’s parliamentary exercise of power through the support of the opposition.
.png)
.png)
